About Civitarianism
Definition
"Civitarianism" is mainstream and centrist. As conservatism opposes liberalism, "civitarianism" opposes "libertarianism." Both libertarians and civitarians are independent of the Left/Right "polarity," but where libertarians are fiscally conservative (like Republicans) and socially liberal (like Democrats), civitarians are fiscally liberal (like Democrats) and socially conservative (like Republicans).
"Fiscal liberalism" acknowledges that government must be engaged in the life of the national economy, especially during downturns in the business cycle. "Social conservatism" respects our cultural and civic heritage—and wants it preserved.
When acknowledged at all, "civitarians" are condescendingly called "populists." They were also called "communitarians" back in the day, but that sounded too much like "communists;" civitarians, like most Americans, are democratic capitalists.
Civitarianism is the true American center. And in a country like these United States, the center owns pride of place.
Tenets
- All men are created equal
- A melting pot, not a salad bowl
- "A job for each and a church for all"
- Democracy is the principle
- Majority rule
Why Light Purple?
Light purple blends our national colors: red, white, and blue
We mix and match "liberalism" (blue) and "conservatism" (red).
- Not classical liberalism: that is bad economics
- Not contemporary liberalism: that is bad civics
- More like, "conservative liberalism" or, if you prefer, "big government conservatism"
And the mixing and matching of "red" and "blue" is etched against the background of our Enlightenment origins.
Enlightenment and Christianity
We were Christian colonies, but it took the Enlightenment to make us a republic.
The Founders went to some lengths to separate the governmental operations of our country from Christianity itself.
While Americans were never obliged to be Christian, the United States is a democracy and Christianity is our majority religion, which gives the Christian faith an important role in our civic life.
Across the decades and generations, we found ways to blend our Enlightenment roots with our Christian faith.
The Enlightenment and Christianity are compatible, where the one emphasizes rational personhood and the other stresses personal accountability.
Civics lead to morality, which in turn creates religion. Even when we do not much believe in God, we can see the importance of religion in our national life.
Americans, whether Christian or not, are blessed that Christianity is our main religion.
The British Enlightenment made us a productive, secular country. Christianity makes us a good country. And democracy makes us a wise country.
Fix the Constitution
Great Country, Bad Constitution
- A constitution strengthens or weakens the moral character of a people.
- It is the foundation of the rule of law.
- Our Constitution may be the foundation of the rule of law in our country, but democracy is the foundation of the Constitution itself.
- Democracy is "all men are created equal," "one person, one vote," and "majority rule."
- Our Constitution does not respect democracy, which makes "rule of law" finagling and even scamming rather than an earnest enterprise.
The British Constitution
Three pillars of "unwritten" British constitution
- Parliamentary sovereignty
- Rule of law
- Democratic accountability
Our Constitution
- The Declaration of Independence is our country's "source of truth."
- The Constitution, though important to the rule of law, is more civic document than legal document.
- It is properly interpreted through the Declaration, the Long Decade of American Genesis (1776-1788), and the first several decades of our constitutional democracy.
- The Constitution was built from the assumption that there would be no political parties.
- "Tyranny of the majority" is an overrated falsehood. Minorities tyrannize, and democracy safeguards against despotism.
- The key to our Constitution is democratic statecraft (consent of the governed, Congressional sovereignty, relative local autonomy).
- A constitution can define the flow of government, but it cannot permanently "separate powers," as power resides in the branch of government wielding the sword.
- This is why democracy requires that the executive have its power sourced in the legislative branch.
- The judiciary can legitimately void laws which are anti-democratic, but there is no judicial role to "review" the constitutional validity of any policy.
- The Constitution itself is not the final word on how the Constitution can be changed.
The Virginia Plan
Restore the Virginia Plan
- Large House of Representatives (one for every 100,000 citizens)
- Small Senate (20-30), chosen by the House from nominees of the several states
- President selected by Congress (and unselected by Congress)
- Constitutional change via national referendums
A Two Cent Version of our Civic Heritage
- The civic truths of our country are found in its earliest decades.
- We declared our independence from Great Britain on July 2, 1776, but we celebrate July Fourth because that was the day the Declaration of Independence was ratified.
- The Declaration says that governments are instituted to secure our unalienable rights, "deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
- In other words, our "natural rights," however much from God, are known democratically.
- Initially, the Founders assumed an inverted relationship between governmental power and individual liberty.
- That assumption was challenged by the breakdowns of American governance during the "long decade of American Genesis" prior to enacting the Constitution in 1788.
- Those failures drove home the moral truth that liberty needs government, that properly construed central government protects liberty, and that democratic consent—"the republican form"—is central government, properly constructed.
- The Constitutional Convention in 1787 had one purpose: to create a more compact, robust, national union by strengthening central authority.
- The Constitution was opposed by anti-Federalists, who worried that it would undermine American democracy, which they associated with localism.
- This worry was contained by the promise of a "Bill of Rights;" Americans mistakenly believed civil liberties protected democracy rather than the other way around.
- It was thought that the new constitutional republic would be non-partisan in nature.
- The non-partisan ideal rapidly evaporated, as Federalist policies created an eruption of democratic outrage.
- The "Revolution of 1800" established, in case there were any doubt, that ours was a Jeffersonian, explicitly democratic, republic.
- For the next two decades, during the "Era of Good Feelings," we reverted to non-partisan government, with the Federalists relegated to the dustbin of history.
- During that time, political elitism was unambiguously rejected and Americans sought to create a middle-class democracy.
- A renewal of partisan fervor picked up in the 1820s, mainly over the role of the central bank in the economic life of our country.
- The earliest decades of our national life were characterized by expanded voting rights, majority rule, widespread democratic participation, and hostility to concentrated economic power.
- Although "Jacksonian America" had profound moral failures, mainly in its treatment of non-white people, it represented a high-water mark in terms of our civic character.
- Commonly held falsehoods, especially the idea that localism fosters democratic empowerment, helped produce economic failures.
- The economic failures were limited by the "Whigs," who championed "the American system" and vigorous national government.
- They were also limited by the expansive nature of Jacksonian policies towards the West.
- This democratic high mark ended in the 1850s, over slavery. For many Americans, national democracy was less important than local autocracy. For most Americans, slavery was an abomination, both morally and economically.
- In 1857, the Supreme Court effectively overruled legislation for the first time with the Dred Scott decision, launching a pattern of anti-democratic behavior from the courts which persist to this day.
- The country fell into civil war when the South rejected the results of the 1860 election.
- After the Civil War, and facilitated by a newly activist judiciary, the United States drifted away from its Jeffersonian ethos and towards oligarchic rule.
- While there were some important reforms implemented in the early part of the 20th century, the Jeffersonian vision was not reinstated until the middle 20th century, in the aftermath of the Great Depression and World War II.
- The Great Prosperity, which extended from the mid-1940s to the mid-1970s, strengthened middle-class capitalism by reinforcing it with an active and energetic national government.
- During the Great Prosperity, a critical mass of Americans saw government as a positive good rather than simply a necessary evil.
- This second version of "Jacksonian America" led to a broad dispersion of prosperity but faded as Americans grew contemptuous of government again.
- Today, disdain for government is regarded as worldly wisdom itself, but corruption is a function of the human soul, not governmental power.
- Despite the asymmetrical competition between the two, anti-government politicians are every bit as corrupt as pro-government politicians.
- In the earliest days of our republic, the Federalists were right about a strong national government, and the Democratic Republicans were right about the importance of democracy.
- Too many Americans today have it ass backwards, thinking that national government should be weak and that democracy is just one freedom among several.
- But in our earliest decades, and again in the mid-20th century, Americans were quite clear that their country, and its government "of the People," was about "the Democracy."
Third Party? The Democracy!
Does our country need a third party? The answer is "yes." Both the Democratic and Republican establishments, as much as they hate each other, have been corrupted by their ongoing proximity to power. Still, and despite the inevitability of corruption, there is no getting around the truth that government power can be a force for good.
The solution to this contradiction is democracy itself—and a shared conviction among citizens that democracy is the best path. The problem with third parties is that people have a variety of viewpoints on the best policies—and policies are the traditional basis for partisan organization.
We do need a third party, but not a conservative party, or a liberal party, or a libertarian party, or even a civitarian party. Rather, we need a third party which busies itself with fixing our civic life, ultimately, with fixing our Constitution through democracy and national plebiscites.
A third "party" could be called "the Democracy," just as it was in the days of Jefferson and Jackson. Its main goal would be to reinstitute deliberative democracy, respect for citizenship, and majority rule.
We defeat the "Epstein class" when we get serious about our democracy—and on that one, it does not matter if we are Left, Right, or Center. Rational people, whatever their fundamental disagreements, see the world in much the same way.
A government which is fully, frequently, and immediately accountable may be frightening to some, but for those of us who respect our fellow Americans, it is the precondition to freedom itself.